Three-quarters of stockpickers lagged US market last year
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.
Just one in four active fund managers that invest in large US-listed companies beat Wall Street’s S&P 500 share gauge in 2021, as stockpickers again struggled to match the returns delivered by cheap index trackers following the US equity market.
The blue-chip, broad-based S&P index delivered a return including dividends of 28.7 per cent last year, with strong gains for five tech giants — Meta (formerly known as Facebook), Apple, Amazon, Microsoft and Google — together accounting for almost one-third of that performance.
This created a significant hurdle for managers focusing on US companies with strong growth characteristics. Just one per cent of active growth managers outperformed the S&P, according to Bank of America.
“Growth managers that were underweight this handful of technology stocks were likely to have underperformed last year,” said Ohsung Kwon, a quantitative strategist at BofA in New York.
In a sign of continued disappointment with the inconsistent performance of stockpickers, outflows mounted last year, extending an exodus that stretches back to 2008. Withdrawals from actively managed US domestic equity funds reached $392.7bn in 2021, according to preliminary data from the Investment Company Institute, a global trade body.
At the same time, investors continued to replace active managers with passively managed exchange traded funds, which track benchmarks such as the S&P 500 and the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite gauge. US domestic equity ETFs attracted net inflows of $476.4bn in 2021, according to Citi.
Active growth managers were collectively underweight Apple last year, holding less of the stock than its slice of the benchmark index. The tech giant has notably just become the first company valued at $3tn, after adding $1tn to its market capitalisation over the past 16 months.
In addition to growth managers, stockpickers known as “core” managers, who look for high quality companies with strong fundamentals, also performed poorly in 2021. Less than a quarter of these investors beat the S&P 500.
The strong performance of US tech behemoths did not mean that stockpickers lacked opportunities to generate ‘alpha’, or market beating returns. Goldman Sachs found that the dispersion of returns produced by the S&P 500’s constituent companies was still robust and only slightly lower last year than its long-run average. That typically provides scope for stock picking fund managers to perform well.
“Unfortunately, active fund managers were unable to capture the available alpha,” said David Kostin, chief US equity strategist at Goldman Sachs.
Still, value-focused active managers who fish for bargains fared much better, with more than two-thirds beating the S&P 500 last year, according to BofA.
“Value managers tended to be overweight in energy and financial stocks which both did very well in 2021,” said Kwon. The US energy and financials sectors returned 55 per cent and 35 per cent respectively last year.
Rick Di Mascio, founder of the Inalytics consultancy, which provides performance analysis and training for stockpickers, said the best-performing value managers had adopted a more flexible approach when identifying potential investments.
“They have moved on from just using metrics such as price-earnings ratios or price to book multiples and now have a more nuanced view of what constitutes a ‘value’ play,” said Di Mascio, a former chief investment officer at the British Coal pension fund.
US small-cap active fund managers also put on a strong showing last year, with most beating the 15 per cent return delivered by the Russell 2000 index — the most widely-followed benchmark for US smaller companies.
“Small cap core, growth and value managers all posted strong hit rates with 85 per cent outperforming the Russell 2000,” said BofA.